A Rhetorical Analysis Of George Orwells, “ Shooting An Elephant.
George Orwell was a British writer, Burman Policeman, and a Anti-Imperialist. The audience that he wanted to reach out to in the story were the Imperialist, British Voters, and the Government Officials. The context of the story was that the Imperialist should preserve their empire, the British Voters should be more responsible, and that the Government Officials should preserve their position. The goal he tried to accomplish was to persuade the Imperialist to let their empire go, to persuade the British voters to be more aware, and to persuade the Government Officials to not make any preservations without change. He tries to persuade his audience by using comparisons, cause and effect, and likelihood as his stratigies to do so.
The short story “Shooting an Elephant” from George Orwell tells about a young Englishman, serving as a police officer in Burma in the 1920s, when Burma was part of the British, which controlled India. During the time of Imperialistic rule, the great empires dominated many subordinate countries to exploit their resources. These European empires
believed it was, “The white man’s burden” to civilize the people they called heathens and savages of these countries. However, as Imperialism was broken down, the question of whether European conquerors were ever in control remains. Also the narrator experiences the conflict between the native people and the oppression of the British rule. Despotic governments result from the need to maintain power over subtly resistant people. The real motives reveal that such a government can rule only by fulfilling the people’s expectations and responding to every crisis with the expected force.
George Orwell uses comparison as one of the strategies by specifically choosing the elephant to represent the the Imperialist and their British Empire. The elephant, a...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document